Tuesday, August 30, 2016

15 Common Defense Mechanisms/Intellectualization

Intellectualization is used to suppress emotions when someone is being confronted with a difficult situation. It is as much a mouthful by pronunciation as it is by definition, and it is extremely difficult to detect if the person deploying this tactic is commonly reserved by nature. We commonly see this defense mechanism used in popular political debates, news interviews, and highly controversial subjects (such as abortion, capital punishment, immigration), because people who exhibit emotions during these events are often immediately discredited.

Intellectualization: Intellectualization is the overemphasis on thinking when confronted with an unacceptable impulse, situation or behavior without employing any emotions whatsoever to help mediate and place the thoughts into an emotional, human context. Rather than deal with the painful associated emotions, a person might employ intellectualization to distance themselves from the impulse, event or behavior. For instance, a person who has just been given a terminal medical diagnosis, instead of expressing their sadness and grief, focuses instead on the details of all possible fruitless medical procedures. (http://psychcentral.com/lib/15-common-defense-mechanisms/)

Have you ever seen Harry Potter and watched as a character insults or frustrates Professor Snape (Alan Rickman R.I.P)? He does show a minimal level of emotions at time, but often he will counter with a cold calculated and overly accentuated response. He uses intellectualization, because he does not know how to channel his frustration in a more regularly recognized emotional outburst. Intellectualization is also commonly seen with the stereotypical math teachers, and it is an internal response to discomfort rather than an external response.  

Does intellectualization exist in MLMers??? Absolutely, especially when it is an upline talking to a downline at any part of the chain. Upline will always strive to show some sort of mental superiority over downline because of their edification. This means they cannot show any form of emotion, other than a false smile and pleasantness, because that would be discrediting themselves and/or bringing them down to a lower level of being. It is a philosophical ploy to ensure downline never questions their advice, and comes to them whenever they have a comment or concern.  They are constantly training themselves and their downline to refer to the same, canned, repetitive discussion points whenever a controversial point is brought to their attention, and as they get more practice with these responses, they become more and more cold to the subject matter. An example of this is, if someone asks if the MLM is a pyramid scheme. They will already have a reply designed to confuse or sound unquestionable and they will deliver the response with little to no emotion. This will intellectualize the concern and usually dissuade the other party from continuing to pressure on the subject. 

If you feel upline has all of the answers and is delivering them to you in rapid succession, then you should take some time to research exactly what they are saying, and why it seems to make sense. There are many resources to disprove the intellectualizations, and if you continue to pressure them on certain points, then the cracks will begin to show. You will start to see upline regress through the other defense mechanisms until they reach denial. Once they have gone back to denial, then the point is moot and should not be pursued further, because you cannot be rational with the irrational.

7 comments:

  1. The biggest defense against the Amway scam is to ask upline to see their profit loss or a schedule C tax return. You don't need to know their personal tax information but you should be well in your rights to demand to know what their income and business expenses are. Your upline will give you BS about how their earnings don't affect yours or that it's none of your business.

    But if you will be investing your time and money to build Amway, then you have every right to ask.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, but most MLMers probably haven't heard of a schedule C, haven't filed their taxes correctly (if at all), and wouldn't be able to justify the gross inconsistencies of their claims versus their reality. I am convinced that MLMers truly believe they are making loads of cash when they see their gross income (assuming it is a decent amount), and then ignore the reality of how much money it took to get there.

      Delete
    2. Amwayers can be taught to be delusional. Look at this link. The IBO thinks his tax refund (from his job income) is Amway profit. Seriously, it's sad.

      https://transparencyofadreamer.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/losing-in-amway/

      Delete
  2. I most certainly agree about the behavior of the uplines with their downlines and I would like to add from my perspective of being a downline at some point and getting bullied by my upline, uplines treat downlines as their slaves to achieve the targeted points or whatever they call it. LITERALLY. I would love if you share my story with your words on your blog to save others from falling for such a scam. I was slaved by my upline for creating a business for her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would be more than happy to share you story, but it has to be in your own words. Nothing is more authentic and engaging than an original piece from the author. You are more than welcome to e-mail me at thedude2488@gmail.com, and I will do my best to add any additional commentary, if necessary, to help complete your story! Good luck and all the best!

      Delete
  3. Hey Doc Doe,

    I enjoyed the article and the only portion I feel should be clarified is the last sentence. I don't feel that it is "rational/irrational" but rather it's the logical response or emotional response. MLM is notorious for leveraging the emotions of their target audience by having "success stories." When the question is posed to a MLMer about whether they are a pyramid scheme, it is an immediate emotional response to explain how they are not one. Generally speaking, there is a strong internal emotion (financial issues, family, friends, a mission in life, etc...) which drives them to be in the MLM industry.

    MLM is highly driven off the emotions of the seller and buyer. Knowingly or not, anyone defending an MLM structure, including their own, will give an emotional response. That is why you won't be able to reason with them.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely agree! If someone wants to give an emotional point of view and disregard facts or logic, then the room for debate is essentially lost!

      Delete